How the GOP tried to destroy Obama and instead committed suicide


Frontline, among others, reported on the Republican gathering just before Obama’s inauguration:

On the night of Barack Obama’s inauguration, a group of top GOP luminaries quietly gathered in a Washington steakhouse to lick their wounds and ultimately create the outline of a plan for how to deal with the incoming administration.

“The room was filled. It was a who’s who of ranking members who had at one point been committee chairmen, or in the majority, who now wondered out loud whether they were in the permanent minority,” Frank Luntz, who organized the event, told FRONTLINE.

Among them were Senate power brokers Jim DeMint, Jon Kyl and Tom Coburn, and conservative congressmen Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan.

After three hours of strategizing, they decided they needed to fight Obama on everything. The new president had no idea what the Republicans were planning.

True to their word in this instance, the Republicans have spent the entirety of President Obama’s two terms obstructing nearly every agenda item possible. POLITICO, as of late December, counted 101 openings for the most senior level administration jobs in the Cabinet-level agencies, out of a total of 379 positions.

Catherine Rampell reported on vacancies at the federal court level noting that last year, the Republican-controlled Senate confirmed just 11 federal judges, the fewest in any year since 1960. Only one appeals court judge was confirmed, the lowest number since 1953.

The Affordable Care Act is the most obvious legislative example of GOP stonewalling. At every turn, Republicans have tried their hardest to prevent President Obama from achieving even the most modest of desired outcomes.

The Result

Let’s ignore opinions of whether or not this was the correct course of action. What were the results of these efforts for the GOP?

First and foremost, look at those congressional power brokers mentioned by name above and where they are now:

  • Jim DeMint: Resigned from the Senate in 2013 to become president of the Heritage Foundation
  • Jon Kyl: Left the Senate at the end of his term in 2012; now works as a lobbyist
  • Tom Coburn: Resigned from the Senate, citing declining health
  • Eric Cantor: Resigned his congressional seat after losing in the primary of 2014; now vice chairman of an investment bank
  • Kevin McCarthy: Failed run for Speaker of the House after the resignation of John Boehner; still a member of Congress
  • Paul Ryan: Currently Speaker of the House, succeeding John Boehner who resigned due to internal pressure from party members

Based purely on these results, one could conclude that the Republican leadership made a fundamental miscalculation in their approach to President Obama. Indeed, many of these members were forced out of Congress because of their failure to stop Obama’s accomplishments completely.

Current State of the Party

That brings us to today. The vast majority of the Republican leadership that promised so loudly to fight President Obama on everything are now gone from the political landscape. President Obama remains, with Hillary Clinton promising to implement a third term of Obama’s policy agenda.

As for the current GOP leadership? It is in disarray, to say the least. After years of attempting to convince Americans that President Obama was destroying the country, that he is a secret Muslim, that the ACA is destroying health care, that America is on the verge of collapse, the Republican presidential nomination is about to be won by Donald Trump.

This GOP primary season has been marked by almost no substantive discussion of issues, no discussion of how to improve the lives of everyday Americans. Instead, it has been marked most visibly by constant name-calling. The race actually hit a new low last week with Marco Rubio asserting that Trump may have ‘wet himself’ while Trump responded by making fun of the size of Rubio’s ears, among other things.

How has Trump enacted a stranglehold on the nomination?

The NYTimes reported this week:

Despite all the forces arrayed against Mr. Trump, the interviews show, the party has been gripped by a nearly incapacitating leadership vacuum and a paralytic sense of indecision and despair, as he has won smashing victories in South Carolina and Nevada.

“A nearly incapacitating leadership vacuum” might be due to the absence of those same Republican leaders who vowed to fight Obama on everything.

What if they had approached the Obama presidency differently? What if they had not portrayed him as the Antichrist and instead prepared to work with him, extracting important concessions on policies that matter to the GOP?

Maybe it wouldn’t have mattered. Maybe they would have been driven out of Washington just as fast as they were in this reality. Maybe Trump would still be the candidate of choice.

But… maybe it could have been different.

In that same NYTimes article, GOP strategists actually discuss potentially running ads against Donald Trump in the general election. The unnamed strategists explain:

A Trump nomination would not only cause Republicans to lose the presidency, they wrote, “but we also lose the Senate, competitive gubernatorial elections and moderate House Republicans.”

It didn’t have to be this way.



That title might sound tongue-in-cheek, but it isn’t meant to be. President Obama’s policies over the last six years are leading to astonishingly positive outcomes. I realize that for a certain set of the population, all numbers are lies and only they know the real truth.

However, for the rest of us, I’m not sure the truly terrific outcomes of this president’s policies are being touted enough. President Obama has lead an incredible turnaround in America and while there is always more work to be done, he is putting together a record that should place him among our greatest presidents. Seriously.

For example, this morning the Dow Jones Industrial Average broke 18,000. This chart shows the DJIA for the last 10 years. Can you tell when Obama’s policies began to be implemented? Hint: it’s just after the lowest point.

DJI Interactive Stock Chart _ Yahoo! Inc

In other news, the U.S. economy grew at a sizzling 5 percent annual rate in the July-September 2014 period, the fastest in more than a decade, on the strength of consumer spending and business investment.

What about unemployment?

In an interview with Time magazine (5-23-12), former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney pledged six percent unemployment by the end of his first term in office.

“I can tell you that over a period of four years, by virtue of the policies that we’d put in place, we’d get the unemployment rate down to 6 percent, and perhaps a little lower,” he told Mark Halperin. Unemployment currently stands at 8.1 percent.

Here is the opening statement from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ December 5, 2014 report:

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 321,000 in November, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 5.8 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains were widespread, led by growth in professional and business services, retail trade, health care, and manufacturing.

Impressive, huh? Obama’s policies have accomplished more in two and a half years than Romney hoped to achieve in four!

How about the number of uninsured Americans? 

But is the ACA costing more or less than projected?


To be 100% clear, the ACA is costing less than projected.

I could go on and on. These are just some of the broad economic indicators that President Obama is really doing an amazing job in spite of an obstructionist Congress that has made this work far more difficult than it had to be. One thing is for sure: pass or fail, Obama deserves the credit (or blame) for these policies. He owns them. Fortunately for him, they seem to be paying off in spades.

It’s one thing to have a different political philosophy and desire different policies. However, if you are convinced Obama is intent on destroying America, you just aren’t paying attention. Good news, though: those tinfoil hats are probably on sale right now!

Meijer is coming; hide the kids. Seriously, children will be in danger.


I live in a wonderful neighborhood just east of Broad Ripple in Indianapolis. A few blocks south of me there is a small apartment building that serves as a buffer between the neighborhood and a row of car dealerships. A developer has purchased these dealerships and would like to put a Meijer superstore on the lots.

How do I feel about this? Honestly, I don’t care too much about the actual store. I wish it was more local and I wish it wasn’t going to be such a huge slab of asphalt parking lot but otherwise I don’t have strong feelings. It’s better than some options, not as good as others.

What I do care about though, passionately so, is my neighborhood where I have lived for 12 years. My neighbors are wonderfully diverse in every respect. There are all ages, ethnicity, and sizes of households. Many walk their dogs, ride their bikes or walk to nearby restaurants for dinner. We have gotten to know many of our neighbors well and have a high degree of trust and concern for each other.

So it is with great concern that I see the plans for the proposed Meijer store would have a primary entrance placed between two neighborhood streets (Brouse and Hillside) on 56th St. This is tremendously unnerving for many reasons.

Traffic and Safety

  1. Keystone is an extremely busy 4+ lane thoroughfare that serves as a primary artery north and south in this part of the city.
  2. People looking for a shortcut to the Meijer entrance will naturally turn up parallel neighborhood streets, where there are no stoplights and fewer obstacles (including police observing traffic).
  3. Our streets are not designed for this kind of traffic. We have very little parking on the street or in small driveways. It’s not unusual for there to be single-lane access down the road currently.
  4. We have no sidewalks in our neighborhood.
  5. 58th St. is a busy cross-street (East-West) that runs to Bishop Chatard High School a few blocks to the west. It is frequented by teen drivers, who often run that stop sign.
  6. 58th and Brouse is also a morning and afternoon bus stop for children in the area. Dramatically increasing traffic on these streets without sidewalks, proper lanes, and other safety features would put these children at significant risk.
  7. In the winter, these streets are often not plowed regularly, increasing the difficulty in passing through them for residents.

These are legitimate concerns about traffic flow being routed onto residential streets without safety features. These concerns should provide the basis for discussion about how to best incorporate businesses such as Meijer that may want to provide access from 56th St.

This is not a NIMBY situation. However, unless these safety concerns are addressed through creative and effective traffic management, I cannot support rezoning the apartment building for heavy retail or the development of a Meijer or similar business. The risk to the safety and infrastructure of these neighborhoods is simply too great.

TL;DR: The proposed Meijer at 56th and Keystone in Indianapolis poses a major safety and traffic problem for residents in the neighborhood immediately bordering this intersection. 

Update: The apartment building and Bennett Innovations on 56th Street are currently zoned as D4, a residential zoning. The apartment building and Bennett Innovations have filed a rezoning petition to change from D4, a type of residential zoning, to a C-4, which would allow the development of a variety of high traffic commercial businesses. 

The hearing for this rezoning is Thursday, October 23, 1:00 PM at the City-County Building, 2nd Floor, 200 E. Washington Street.

We should reinstate the draft.


The Problem

Our elected officials now flat out to refuse to do any work within six months of an election, for fear of having a vote on the record that will hurt them in an upcoming election, in this case the midterms. This is inexcusable. They are elected to govern and serve, not to be re-elected.

The clearest indication of their collective abdication of responsibility is their unwillingness to debate the prospect of again entering into a significant military engagement in the Middle East. If any issue is deserving of debate, surely it is the choice to send Americans into war?

I don’t even have a strong opinion about whether or not we should go or at what level. I have only a rudimentary understanding of the issues and players involved and I feel like I really don’t know enough about the situation to have a credible opinion. This is where (ideally) our elected officials would gather advanced intelligence from sources better than mine and debate the various options to come to a considered decision.

Instead, we get the mess we have in Washington, where officials are terrified to go on the record within months of a midterm election. Just look at this exchange on ABC between George Stephanopoulos and Speaker Boehner:

“If no one else will step up, would you recommend putting American boots on the ground?” Stephanopoulos pressed.

“We have no choice,” Boehner warned. “These are barbarians. They intend to kill us, and if we don’t destroy them first, we’re going to pay the price.”

If the president requested new authorization for the use of military force, Boehner pledged to call the House back into session “next week.”

“I’d be happy to,” he said. “The president has not done that. He believes he has authority under existing resolutions to do what he’s done.”

“You don’t agree?” Stephanopoulos asked.

“I think he does have the authority to do it, but the point I’m making is this is a proposal that the Congress ought to consider,” the speaker said.

Oh, heavens! Congress would like to debate the president’s actions and America’s response to a serious national security threat but President Obama hasn’t asked them to discuss it! Whatever shall they do?

I think we all know just how dearly Congress treasures the president’s feelings so it’s understandable that they are paralyzed without his explicit invitation. /sarcasm  To ALL in Congress: Shame on you.

The Solution: Reinstate the Military Draft

First, let me be clear that I’d like to reinstate the draft with no exemptions for those of wealth or privilege. It’s critical that no one gets deferred because of their connections.

Put the children and grandchildren of the wealthy and influential in the mix and try to get by without a serious debate about the personal and societal costs of war. It won’t fly. You can be damn sure that if a good number of people in Congress (or their major donors) thought their loved ones might be sent to war, they’d have a debate about whether or not this is worth it.

Maybe it is worth it, maybe it isn’t. We’d at least hear reasons and arguments from all involved. Now, we just get cowards living out the truth of Bob Dylan’s Masters of War, hiding behind desks while they send others to death:

Come you masters of war
You that build all the guns
You that build the death planes
You that build the big bombs
You that hide behind walls
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know
I can see through your masks